WhichTrial Monthly Report · Issue 1

The US Clinical Trial Recruiting Pipeline

March 2026 → May 2026 — what gained ground, what slipped, what entered, and what left.

Published May 1, 2026 · Data through 2026-05 · By WhichTrial

The numbers at a glance

11,854

drugs in active recruiting trials (May 2026)

30,480

recruiting trials across 17 conditions

617

drugs exited recruiting since March

453

drugs entered recruiting since March

Two months of change. The recruiting pipeline shrank by 164 drugs on net. 254 drugs picked up additional recruiting trials, 368 lost ground but kept at least one open study, and 10,779 held flat.

Top gainers

Drugs that added the most recruiting trials between March and May. The list skews toward established cytotoxic and checkpoint-inhibitor backbones — but the most editorially interesting mover is much further down the table.

DrugMarMayΔ trialsSponsors
Tirzepatide2735+830
Bevacizumab196203+7123
Cyclophosphamide332337+5146
Fludarabine190194+490
Temozolomide7579+464
Ivonescimab2529+421
Sacituzumab tirumotecan2125+45
Gemcitabine182185+3122
Osimertinib4144+336
Orelabrutinib1922+314
Elacestrant1518+315
PF-0863440469+31
NNC0487-011114+31
Capecitabine158160+299
Toripalimab7981+246

Spotlight · Mover of the month

Tirzepatide accelerates: GLP-1 expansion isn't slowing

Tirzepatide is the only mover of its size in our May snapshot. Eli Lilly's GLP-1/GIP dual agonist — sold as Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and Zepbound for obesity — went from 27 actively-recruiting US trials in March to 35 in May, a roughly 30 percent gain in eight weeks. The number of distinct sponsors running tirzepatide studies climbed from 23 to 30, and the number of indications attached to those trials rose from 57 to 66. Notably, the broader GLP-1 class is not moving in lockstep: semaglutide recruiting trials actually fell from 25 to 23 over the same window, and retatrutide slipped from 4 to 3. The acceleration is tirzepatide-specific.

What's striking is that Lilly itself sponsors only five of the 35 recruiting tirzepatide trials in our database. The other 30 are run by academic medical centers, NIH institutes, and a handful of other industry sponsors. That pattern — most of the recruiting footprint sitting outside the originator — has emerged in the wake of Lilly's recent regulatory wins. Zepbound's December 2024 FDA approval for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, the SUMMIT Phase 3 readout in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and the SYNERGY-NASH Phase 2 hit (73 percent MASH resolution at the 15 mg dose vs. 13 percent on placebo)[1][2][3] have all widened the indication landscape. Recently-started tirzepatide trials (start dates Feb–Apr 2026) include the NIAAA studying metabolic alcohol-associated liver disease, MGH probing early-onset colorectal cancer prevention, UNC Lineberger looking at obesity-driven endometrial cancer, St. Jude testing it in childhood-cancer survivors, and a Phase 3 placebo-controlled study from a sponsor called Hudson Biotech (NCT07481747). Lilly's own Phase 3 MASH master protocol (NCT07165028) anchors the liver-disease push.

For the broader pipeline, what we observe is that tirzepatide is being used as a comparator and adjunct, not just as a study drug in its own right. Recruiting trials in oncology supportive care, transplant medicine, opioid use disorder, knee osteoarthritis, and HIV-associated inflammation all include it as a metabolic lever rather than the primary agent under investigation. Whether that translates into meaningful trial-site capacity pressure on adjacent metabolic programs is something we'll be watching across the next several monthly snapshots. Lilly's next-generation triple agonist retatrutide also remains in active Phase 3 development, though its current recruiting footprint in our dataset is small (3 trials in May, down from 4 in March).

  1. [1]Pharmacy Times — Tirzepatide reduces sleep-apnea events
  2. [2]BioSpace — Lilly's tirzepatide clears Phase 3 cardiovascular study
  3. [3]Eli Lilly investor release — SYNERGY-NASH MASH resolution data

Top losers

Drugs that lost the most recruiting trials but still have at least one study open. A drop here means trials have moved out of the recruiting phase — either they completed enrollment, were terminated, or moved to active-not-recruiting status.

DrugMarMayΔ trialsSponsors
Pembrolizumab447431-16239
carboplatin320307-13169
Sacituzumab govitecan4434-1027
Tazemetostat124-84
Dexamethasone163156-7100
Pemetrexed117110-773
Cisplatin261255-6151
Lenalidomide8882-659
Metformin5953-647
Venetoclax192187-599
Doxorubicin10196-564
Obinutuzumab:6257-534
Nivolumab176172-4105
Nab paclitaxel126122-480
Etoposide9995-470

Spotlight · Plateau watch

Keytruda decelerates: a maturing IV franchise rotates into ADCs and Qlex

Pembrolizumab's recruiting footprint dropped from 447 to 431 trials between March and May 2026, the largest absolute decline on the board. The footprint we track is dominated by Phase 1 and Phase 2 investigator-led combinations — only 77 of the 431 active trials are Phase 3, and Merck itself sponsors just 32 of them; the rest sit at academic medical centers, the NCI, and other co-sponsors. Among the trials that fell out of recruiting status in the period, the visible pattern is mostly late-stage academic combination studies (Dana-Farber, MSKCC, NCI, Northwestern) reaching their enrollment caps with completion dates in 2026, alongside an Amgen biosimilar PK study (NCT06430866). What we can't tell from the snapshot alone is whether the −16 reflects normal trial-program lifecycle or something more structural — Merck doesn't publicly distinguish between the two.

What is publicly documented is the broader Merck pipeline activity surrounding pembrolizumab. The September 2025 FDA approval of Keytruda Qlex (pembrolizumab co-formulated with berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph) generated $128M in its first full quarter, and CEO Rob Davis has guided to 30–40% US patient conversion by 2027, which Merck has framed as a key lever ahead of the 2028 US composition-of-matter patent cliff [2][3]. The KEYNOTE-A86 NSCLC non-inferiority trial backing the SC switch is still recruiting and reads out in October 2026 [5]. Separately, on the April 30 Q1 earnings call, management framed sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT, the Kelun-partnered TROP2 ADC) as a “cornerstone and workhorse” with 17 Phase 3 studies underway, 13 of them first-mover, and the first sac-TMT/Keytruda combo readout in 1L NSCLC just printed [1] — sac-TMT also grew +4 trials in our March-to-May window. The 2023 Merck/Daiichi Sankyo deal ($4B upfront, up to $22B) covering three DXd-ADCs is also still active [6]. We're flagging these as context, not as a verified causal explanation for the −16.

Across the rest of the PD-1/PD-L1 class, the picture is mixed rather than category-wide saturation. Nivolumab is also off (−4) but the rest is flat-to-positive in our snapshot: Atezolizumab unchanged, Durvalumab −2, Tislelizumab +1, Cemiplimab +2, Toripalimab +2. Regeneron's October 2025 adjuvant CSCC approval and its Libtayo-as-backbone strategy across 30+ tumor types — including combinations with fianlimab (LAG-3) — suggest cemiplimab has continued runway[7]. Coherus/Junshi's Loqtorzi grew Q2 2025 net revenue 36% year-over-year off the late-2023 NPC approval, with Phase 1b/2 expansion data in HCC, HNSCC, gastric, and esophageal expected through 2026 [8]. Whether the pembro decline persists into the next snapshot, and whether competitor gains continue, is what we'll be tracking.

  1. [1]Merck Q1 2026 earnings call (Apr 30, 2026) — sac-TMT framing
  2. [2]Merck press release — Keytruda Qlex FDA approval (Sept 19, 2025)
  3. [3]BioSpace — Davis 30–40% conversion target
  4. [5]AJMC — KEYNOTE-A86 (NCT04956692), Phase 3 SC vs IV NSCLC
  5. [6]STAT News — Merck/Daiichi Sankyo $22B ADC deal (Oct 2023)
  6. [7]Regeneron IR — Libtayo adjuvant CSCC approval (Oct 2025)
  7. [8]Coherus Oncology Q2 2025 results — Loqtorzi growth

Drugs that left recruiting

617 drugs that had at least one recruiting trial in March no longer do in May. Most are long-tail compounds with one or two trials that completed enrollment; a handful are clinically meaningful.

New entrants

453 drugs began recruiting between March and May that hadn't previously appeared in our snapshot. Most are early-phase, single-sponsor studies — first signals of new programs.

About this report

Data source. All figures are derived from the public ClinicalTrials.gov registry, queried monthly. We track US-based recruiting trials across 17 condition categories and ~50 metro areas.

What “recruiting” means. A trial is recruiting when ClinicalTrials.gov flags its overall status as RECRUITING. When a trial no longer appears in our monthly fetch, we mark it as “not recruiting” — it may have completed enrollment, been suspended, terminated, or moved to active-not-recruiting status. We don't distinguish between those states in the aggregates above.

What “exited” means. A drug exited recruiting if it had at least one trial flagged RECRUITING in March 2026 and has zero such trials in May 2026. The drug itself isn't gone — its open trial pipeline is.

Limitations. Our extraction filters out generic terms (placebo, chemotherapy, radiation, saline) and intervention names longer than 60 characters, so very long trial-arm descriptions aren't counted as drugs. Some drugs appear under multiple aliases; we deduplicate where we can.