Cardioinhibitory Reflex Syncope. Permanent Pacemaker Therapy or Cardioneuroablation?

Summary

Reflex syncope is the most common form of syncope. It can lead to injuries and affect quality of life. Nonpharmacological and medical therapies have limited effectiveness. In certain patients, cardiac pacing seem to be beneficial. More recently cardioneuroablation (CNA) has emerged as a novel therapy for reflex syncope. The investigators aim to determine whether CNA is more effective than cardiac pacing at reducing the rate of cardioinhibitory-type reflex syncope.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

* Aged more than 40 years.
* Having a 12-month history that includes at least two documented episodes of spontaneous reflex syncope or one episode that led to injury in addition to at least two presyncopal events, refractory to all recommended types of standard treatment.
* Bradycardia-syncope correlation (at least 3 seconds of asystole due to sinus arrest or atrio-ventricular block) confirmed by ECG during spontaneous syncope.
* If lacking ECG evidence during spontaneous syncope, a cardioinhibitory response (VASIS type 2A or 2B) on tilt test.
* Displaying indicators for pacing such as those suggested in the ESC guidelines for a class I recommendation for patients with reflex syncope.
* Significantly decreased quality of life due to syncope.
* Sinus rhythm on ECGs.
* Obtained written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Intrinsic sinus or atrioventricular nodal disease with a proven indication for permanent pacemaker implantation.
* Evidence of structural heart disease.
* Contraindications to ablation in the right or left atrium.
* Life expectancy \<12 months.
* Lacking willingness to comply with the randomization procedure.

Conditions2

Browse More Trials