Feasibility Study of Non-Contact Imaging-Based Physiological Monitoring in the Operating Room

Summary

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a non-contact, camera-based physiological monitoring technology in a perioperative setting (including anesthesia induction, surgery, and recovery).Conventional vital sign monitoring tools-such as ECG leads, blood pressure cuffs, and pulse oximeters-require direct skin contact, which may pose risks of cross-infection or skin injury in vulnerable populations (e.g., newborns or elderly patients). This research utilizes remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology to estimate vital signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), by analyzing facial video captured via standard camera devices (Logitech C930, iPhone 16 Pro Max, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra).The primary goal is to assess the consistency and stability of this non-contact system compared to clinical gold-standard monitors (Masimo Root, SedLine O3, and Radical-7) during actual surgical procedures. The findings will serve as a foundation for developing non-invasive, supplementary monitoring tools in dynamic clinical environments.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients aged \>18 years.
2. Patients scheduled to undergo surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I, II, or III.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients aged \< 18 years.
2. Pregnant patients.
3. Patients whose facial images cannot be captured or recognized (e.g., due to surgical drapes, severe edema, or major trauma).
4. Patients who refuse to participate or have not signed the informed consent form.
5. Other cases deemed unsuitable for the study by the clinical physician or anesthesiologist.

Conditions7

Browse More Trials