WhichTrial Monthly Report · Issue 2

The US Clinical Trial Recruiting Pipeline

May 2026 → June 2026 — a quiet month, and a look back at the two calls we made last issue.

Published June 1, 2026 · Data through 2026-06 · By WhichTrial

The numbers at a glance

12,016

drugs in active recruiting trials (June 2026)

30,761

recruiting trials across 17 conditions

181

drugs exited recruiting since May

343

drugs entered recruiting since May

One month of change, and a quiet one. The recruiting pipeline grew by 162 drugs on net. 242 drugs picked up additional recruiting trials, 195 lost ground but kept at least one open study, and 11,236 held flat. Over a single month the individual moves are small — the headline is continuity, not upheaval, so this issue spends its column inches revisiting the two calls we made in Issue 1.

Top gainers

Drugs that added the most recruiting trials between May and June. Over a single month the top of this list is just cytotoxic backbones drifting up a few trials each — cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, capecitabine. There's no breakout mover this month; the real story is in the continuity check below, where last issue's two calls get tested against fresh data.

DrugMayJunΔ trialsSponsors
Cyclophosphamide337347+10151
Fludarabine194202+892
Capecitabine160168+8100
NNC0487-011148+41
Placebo (matched to NNC0487-0111)37+41
Toripalimab8184+347
Serplulimab2528+318
Mycophenolate Mofetil2326+314
Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA® )1215+313
Romiplostim N0147+36
Oxaliplatin149151+292
Tislelizumab8890+262
Lenvatinib6668+250
Letrozole4648+233
Sacituzumab govitecan3436+229

Top losers

Drugs that lost the most recruiting trials but still have at least one study open. A drop here means trials have moved out of the recruiting phase — either they completed enrollment, were terminated, or moved to active-not-recruiting status. Pembrolizumab's continued slide (see below) shows up here again.

DrugMayJunΔ trialsSponsors
Cetuximab8476-855
Pemetrexed110103-770
Pembrolizumab431425-6236
Venetoclax187182-597
Azacitidine8277-553
carboplatin307303-4168
Paclitaxel213209-4128
Atezolizumab111107-479
Cytarabine8985-440
Nivolumab172169-3105
Dexamethasone156153-398
Prednisone8986-350
Sacituzumab tirumotecan2522-35
Psilocybin2421-319
Belantamab mafodotin1310-37

Spotlight · Continuity check

Two calls, one month later: the tirzepatide surge cooled, the Keytruda slide held

Last issue we made two specific calls. The first was tirzepatide as mover of the month, surging from 27 actively-recruiting US trials in March to 35 in May. In June it added just one — 35 → 36. The surge has flattened. But the spread underneath it continued: distinct sponsors running tirzepatide studies rose from 30 to 32, and the number of indications attached to those trials widened from 66 to 72. So the drug is still diffusing into new disease areas even though net new trial starts paused for the month. The rest of the GLP-1 class stayed quiet too — semaglutide added two (23 → 25) and retatrutide held at three. Read: the March-to-May acceleration looks like a two-month pulse rather than the start of a sustained ramp. Whether July resumes it is exactly the kind of thing a monthly cadence is built to catch.

The second call was a “plateau watch” on Keytruda, down from 447 to 431 recruiting trials across the two-month window. June extends the slide: 431 → 425, another −6, with the number of indications attached falling from 833 to 820. At roughly six to eight trials a month, the decline is steady rather than accelerating — consistent with a maturing IV franchise whose investigator-led combination studies are reaching their enrollment caps. Around it, the PD-1/PD-L1 field tilted slightly negative this month: nivolumab −3, atezolizumab −4, cemiplimab −2, durvalumab flat. The exceptions were the China-origin checkpoint inhibitors, which kept gaining — toripalimab +3 (81 → 84) and tislelizumab +2 (88 → 90).

One reversal is worth flagging against last issue. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT), the Merck/Kelun TROP2 antibody-drug conjugate we noted growing +4 in the March-to-May window, gave back three trials this month (25 → 22) on an unchanged five sponsors — a reminder that at these trial counts a single month of ADC movement is well within the noise band. That is the broader takeaway for June: two calls tested, both broadly holding, and a board that otherwise moved no more than registry churn would predict. A quiet month is still a data point.

Drugs that left recruiting

181 drugs that had at least one recruiting trial in May no longer do in June. Over a one-month window these are almost entirely long-tail compounds with one or two trials that wrapped enrollment — no clinically marquee program left the board this month.

New entrants

343 drugs began recruiting between May and June that hadn't previously appeared in our snapshot. As usual, most are early-phase, single-sponsor studies — first signals of new programs.

About this report

Data source. All figures are derived from the public ClinicalTrials.gov registry, queried monthly. We track US-based recruiting trials across 17 condition categories and ~50 metro areas.

A note on the window. Issue 1 compared two snapshots two months apart (March → May). This issue compares consecutive months (May → June), so the deltas are naturally smaller — a one-month change captures less program turnover than a two-month one. Read the magnitudes here against that shorter window, not against last issue's.

What “recruiting” means. A trial is recruiting when ClinicalTrials.gov flags its overall status as RECRUITING. When a trial no longer appears in our monthly fetch, we mark it as “not recruiting” — it may have completed enrollment, been suspended, terminated, or moved to active-not-recruiting status. We don't distinguish between those states in the aggregates above.

What “exited” means. A drug exited recruiting if it had at least one trial flagged RECRUITING in May 2026 and has zero such trials in June 2026. The drug itself isn't gone — its open trial pipeline is.

Limitations. Our extraction filters out generic terms (placebo, chemotherapy, radiation, saline) and intervention names longer than 60 characters, so very long trial-arm descriptions aren't counted as drugs. Some drugs appear under multiple aliases; we deduplicate where we can.